Exposure to LBGTQ+ Culture is Not Going To Turn Your Kids Gay

“Transgender people want to groom our kids and turn them gay!”

I wish that was hyperbole.

It’s not.

There seems to be a faction of the world that believes that “gay” is something you can catch through exposure, like a cold. Others think being gay or transgender is a mental disorder.

Then there’s these guys.

I was curious, as I always am, about if having gay parents makes a kid more likely to identify as other than heterosexual as an adult. Do kids raised by same-sex parents have poorer outcomes than their opposite-sex raised peers? Finally, can having a transgender person read a book to your Kindergarten class turn a kid transgender if they aren’t already?

My Experiences with the LGBTQ+ Community

Being gay was never, ever portrayed as anything unacceptable in my family. My mom had a gay brother, as did my dad. We never knew that their having a boyfriend (later, husband) was anything to get worked up over. They were just part of the family.

Both of my uncle faced hardships when coming out into their Catholic families, as was expected at the time. These days, I have family members who identify as bi, gay, and transgender. We love all of them, even though Grandma needed some extra time to wrap her head around being trans.

This accepting environment that I grew up in might be uncommon, I’m not sure. It certainly set me up for a life of loving and accepting LGBTQ folks. We go to Pride, Drag and Burlesque shows, and the only bar I’ll ever go to alone is a Gay Bar. It ain’t no thang.

With that understand of my position, let’s look at the research.

Studies on Kids of Same-Sex Parents

Research into these topics is not uncommon, but longitudinal research is. Many of the published research has certain problems, like small study size, no controls, etc.

An OLR Research report summed it up well:

Researchers studying gay and lesbian households also acknowledge difficulties in studying these families. Some they ascribe to a lack of reliable information on the number and location of gay and lesbian families, which prevents researchers from using random, representative samples in their studies. (Most research to date has involved small groups of white lesbian mothers who are comparatively better educated and wealthier than the general population. ) Another problem is that visible gay parenting is such a recent phenomenon that most studies are of the children of self-identified lesbians and gay men who became parents in the context of heterosexual relationships that dissolved before or after they assumed a gay identity. And a third problem is that since gay men and lesbians cannot marry, researchers cannot compare child outcomes between ‘married’ and ‘unmarried’ same-sex parents or similarly-situated heterosexual households.

The longest-running longitudinal study is on children of lesbian parents, which has been ongoing since 1986. I will use this research as my core, since it’s the largest and longest running, and supplement in some of the studies that include male same-sex parents.

In a paper released as part of this study entitled, “Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Among Donor‑Conceived Offspring in the U.S. National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study from Adolescence to Adulthood”, the following was concluded: “This is the only study that has followed the biological offspring of lesbian parents from birth to adulthood, prospectively and longitudinally. The results indicate that offspring of lesbian parents are less likely to identify as transgender than the general public, but more likely to identify as LGB or queer

The second part doesn’t surprise me. If your family will obviously accept you for who you are, you don’t have to bury your feelings to keep your family on your side.

Reading deeper into the study, you’ll find this gem, “The self-reported quality of life of the adolescents in this sample was similar to that reported by a comparable sample of adolescents with heterosexual parents”.

Conversely, though, literature reviews find a different result. Findings from Bridgewater State University when both same-sex male and female parents are considered suggest no statistically relevant difference between rates of children from same-sex marriages identifying as homosexual. Quote, “We have presented a different approach for determining consensus by evaluating 72 literature reviews published on same-sex parenting between 2001 and 2017 with a focus on the issue of whether LGBTQ parents are more likely (or not) to raise children who are LGBTQ. Our results, derived from English language social science journals, found that over 90% of the literature reviews agreed with a ‘no difference’ conclusion. The few that disagreed with that consensus had major limitations”.

Research coming out of the Netherlands found that children raised by same-sex parents outperform their opposite-sex peers in both primary and secondary education. Netherlands being the source is interesting, as same-sex marriage has been legal there for 20+ years. Dr. Deni Mazrekaj states, “We found that same-sex parents are often wealthier, older and more educated than the typical different-sex couple. Same-sex couples often have to use expensive fertility treatments to have a child, meaning they tend to have a high level of wealth and are also very motivated to become parents. Their children perform very well in school“.

The findings for the same topic in the states doesn’t find an advantage to same-sex raised kids, but finds no disadvantage when compared to their peers. Boston University release an article called “Gay Parents As Good As Straight Ones”, wherein I found this: “Siegel and Perrin’s report also cites three studies done in the United States and Europe—two involving lesbian mothers and the third one involving men and women whose adult children reported they’d had a parent involved in a same-sex relationship. Those studies similarly found no difference in outcomes for the children as compared with children of heterosexual parents”.

To sum it up, it appears that having gay parents in no way sets a kid up for a life of misery, or even a higher chance of identifying as homosexual. In fact, some findings suggest kids of gay parents have an even great chance of success than their peers. Regardless of whether they have the same chances as their peers OR a greater chance, the studies do show that gay parents are, overall, good parents.

Drag Queens and Reading to Kids

I gotta say, I love a good drag show. Something about the campiness and people living their best lives authentically really gets me. My favorite ever was a Drag King at Lush in Minneapolis re-enacting the Book of Mormon. It was FANTASTIC.

I also wouldn’t have an issue with a drag queen reading to my kids. If a man dressed up as a fancy lady and reading Clifford the Big Red Dog is going to inspire my kid to identify as transgender, she was bound to find that inspiration somewhere in her life eventually. I believe you can’t MAKE trans kids. Am I right?

It’s hard to directly answer that question. One study examined the perceptions of Library Workers who have and have not hosted a Drag Queen Storytime event. When asked about how it impacts child development, “The majority of all respondents strongly agreed or agreed that DQS supports healthy child development and positively influences children’s understanding of gender and/or sexuality; however, there were significant differences with small to moderate effect sizes between hosts and non-hosts”.

Another research paper I could only get free access to because I’m an M.S. Student at NYU is called, “Child-Sacrificing Drag Queens: Historical Antecedents in Disinformative Narratives Supporting the Drag Queen Story Hour Moral Panic“. What a name!

The key finding here was, “There have been no documented cases of a child molested due to a DQSH event. It is, of course, possible that DQSH increases acceptance of LGBTQ+ people, but whether that is troubling depends on your point of view.

It’s not troubling in mine.

Conclusion

Short but sweet: Kids in gay homes aren’t at any disadvantage compared to their peers, per the research. They may be slightly more likely to identify as other than heterosexual (gay, bi), but not more likely to identify as transgender.

I personally know two women raised by gay parents, and they turned out fantastic. Successful in both family and career endeavors.

Unsurprisingly, drag queens aren’t coming for our kids. Their existence in society has no negative consequences for our kids, but they do raise the blood pressure of a certain demographic of crusading Christians and bigots. That’s a THEM problem, not a QUEEN problem.

Slipping this in here as a future research topic: Does transitioning as a teenager impact long term mental and physical health? 🤔

Thanks for reading!

9 responses

  1. eaglegenerouslyd136c69f39 Avatar
    eaglegenerouslyd136c69f39

    Oh, my. (to quote George Takei) I am struck by only one thing in your research, and that is “same sex families.” If you are “born that way” and cannot change, then how do people who have married and had children suddenly “discover” they are gay, and take the kids with them to become a same-sex couple with kids?

    Like

    1. Because those people were ALWAYS gay and tried to hide it for social reasons. My Uncle’s husband has two kids from a previous marriage, as does my Uncle on the other side. They want so badly to fit into a society that doesn’t like them that they try for years to hide their true identity and eventually reach a point where they can’t do it anymore.

      Like

      1. eaglegenerouslyd136c69f39 Avatar
        eaglegenerouslyd136c69f39

        You are still missing the boat, perhaps because you are close to the issue and making excuses. You are making the fundamental mistake of confusing and conflating orientation and behavior. What’s the old adage, “we are all born killers. It’s our nature. But we do not act on it.”

        You can argue, though I simply do not believe it, that orientation is something we are born with and cannot change. I think there is some small, inborn predisposition which makes people susceptible to a particular mental aberration, BUT, for the sake of argument, let us grant that assumption–inborn, unchangeable. Now from there, we take the old adage and recognize that /behavior/ is ALWAYS a choice. So, those with a gay orientation can behave consistent with it, but never contrary to it. Those who get married and have children can NOT be gay because their behavior does not reflect their (according to you, true) nature. To later “discover” they are gay and change their behavior cannot change that. Worse yet, they are breaking up a perfectly good, socially acceptable and even necessary family unit to create one that is neither.

        You want to be gay, go ahead. Find a little Shade of Gray with a willing partner, I don’t care. But don’t pretend it’s normal, especially with kids involved. And I believe gays are made, not born. There is evidence for that.

        Like

      2. All of my data is based on science, so I’m not certain how I’m missing the boat. If you can find me research done by a non-biased organization that proves I’m wrong, I welcome it.

        The fact is, most people aren’t born attracted to the same sex. Being born attracted to the same sex to the point where you’d want your life partner to be of the same sex means you’re bisexual or gay, depending on your feeling on the opposite sex, is uncommon. People get married for the sake of social norms ALL THE TIME, see the trend of Lavendar Marriages where one or both of the partners of a hetero marriage is out and gay. There are two types of marriages: legal and religious. I was married by a Christian pastor and had to do marriage counseling beforehand. I was also married legally, so I had to go to the courthouse and apply for a marriage license, entitling my husband and I to the benefits of marriage (taxes, namely).

        Viewing homosexuality as deemed by behavior and not identity is where I believe you and I differ. That’s like saying it’s okay to feel like a pedophile, but as long as you don’t abuse kids you’re not one. Pedophilia, is of course, wrong, because it involves children who could not possibly consent. Two consenting minors or two consenting adults choosing to love another person of the same sex breaks no cultural norms, apart from religious ones. If a Church chooses to not marry same-sex people, so be it. They’ll lose congregants who believe gay people have a right to religion, but that’s their choice. Refusing to allow same-sex legal marriages though, is bringing religion to the state which you know I disagree with.

        The concept of homosexuality and transgenderism has been around since the beginning of time. About one is 1000 kids is born intersex, with XXY or XYY chromosomes. XXY chromosomes mean they could be considered both male and female. It’s literally embedded in our genetic code.

        On the choice to break up a family to live authentically, one of my uncles identifies as gay, the other as attracted to both but only wanting to build a life with one. They’ve both felt this way from the very start, about the age when all kids figure sexuality out. The fact that one tried to live a proper Catholic life before realizing it was driving him insane does not make him any less gay; he’s always FELT the same way but didn’t BEHAVE the same way.

        It’s fair to say being gay isn’t the norm, but not that it’s harmful to kids. If your religion sees homosexuality as a sin, that is what it is – don’t enforce it on other people. If seeing gay people was enough to “turn” kids, not a single straight kid would make it to adulthood.

        Like

  2. blue605b1f70aff Avatar
    blue605b1f70aff

    This may be the most complex issue you have tackled.
    I think there is a lot more than just sexuality in play. It’s also love, and interests and friendships. We are in essence constantly tweaking a Venn diagram of all of these (and more) trying to create the largest overlap in quest for happiness. Some people may choose to put their sexual preference aside to maximize other parts of their life, recognizing that 98% of our life is spent on activities other than sex.
    Labels suck. The baggage that comes with the labels, even more so.  If a 13-year-old boy declares his love for Bobby it’s likely his Venn overlap will shrink. If he declares his love for Sally, little changes. Odds are he isn’t going to marry either one of them and it wasn’t really love but more of a first-time rush of dopamine, but the permanency we place on the former is problematic. By declaring his love for Bobby, his future dating pool just shrunk from 45% of the population to 5%. That, in turn, creates a new set of decisions, many of which are difficult to reverse course on.
    Nothing a teenager decides should be remotely permanent.

    Like

    1. I agree with a teenager not deciding anything permanent. I went through many a phase in High School, none of which have become my permanent “personality”. The one thing that has stuck is sexuality.

      Here’s where I stand on medically transitioning for kids: I think puberty blockers and surgical gender affirming care should be reserved for adults, because of the lack of permanence of a teenager’s ideals. I saw this without really looking into the data on how trans people who transitioned as teenagers feel now as adults, and without any scientific knowledge on the long-term health impacts of early transitioning. This is purely an opinion that could easily change with data showing its 1) not likely to be something the person regrets and 2) there are no long-term impacts of puberty blockers and HRT on a minor.

      There are certain things that do have long-term impacts of a developing mind and body, like cannabis usage. I fully support adult’s rights to use cannabis but know it can have negative impacts when used by people underage. My gut feeling is HRT could have similar impacts on a kiddo, but that’s just literally a gut feeling.

      Like

  3. eaglegenerouslyd136c69f39 Avatar
    eaglegenerouslyd136c69f39

    The research is starting to come in. Kids who transition are MORE likely to suicide than those who don’t, and 95+% of kids with “gender dysphoria” outgrow it before becoming adults. A few years ago there was a great hue and cry to ban “child sexual mutilation” as practiced by some “tribes.” We should do the same.

    Like

    1. If data continues to support the need for children to wait for adulthood to transition, I will make that my message. It’s not because I don’t want kids to be transgender, I just want them to wait until there’s no risk to their development to begin transitioning. If they choose to outwardly identify as the other sex without HRT, puberty blockers and surgery, I’m all for them experimenting with their identity.

      Like

      1. eaglegenerouslyd136c69f39 Avatar
        eaglegenerouslyd136c69f39

        I favor not encouraging them in their delusions. If 95+% of them will “grow out of it,” the sooner we can allow them to do that, or disallow them the other, however you want to think of it or do it, the better.

        Like

Leave a reply to eaglegenerouslyd136c69f39 Cancel reply

About the author

Hannah is a cybersecurity expert, Master’s degree Student and a freelance blogger with a passion for finding the fact and fiction behind political debates and hot-button issues. This blog is a passion project, and anyone learning anything from it is just a bonus. The author feels that anyone can literally say anything; what matters is what they can prove.

Get updates

Spam-free subscription, we guarantee. This is just a friendly ping when new content is out.